Problems: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
273 bytes added ,  19 December 2014
Line 145: Line 145:
  PARAMETERS OF THE REDUCED CELL (ANGSTROEM & DEGREES)
  PARAMETERS OF THE REDUCED CELL (ANGSTROEM & DEGREES)
     34.71    84.72    213.67    90.35    90.27    90.06
     34.71    84.72    213.67    90.35    90.27    90.06
This clearly indicates that the third axis above the table (with 1/length=34.71) actually should be twice that size. If this happens, the histogram of indexed spots often has two equally-large subtrees:
Do you see the half-integer difference vectors in the last column? This clearly indicates that the third axis above the table (with 1/length=34.71) actually should be twice that size. If this happens, the histogram of indexed spots often has two equally-large subtrees:
  SUBTREE    POPULATION
  SUBTREE    POPULATION
   
   
Line 154: Line 154:
     5            6
     5            6


Remedy: take the reduced cell below the table, but double the 34.71, and stick it into the line
Remedy: take the reduced cell (as found below the table), but double the 34.71, and stick it into the line
  UNIT_CELL_CONSTANTS=69.42    84.72    213.67    90.35    90.27    90.06  
  UNIT_CELL_CONSTANTS=69.42    84.72    213.67    90.35    90.27    90.06  
To make XDS use that line, specify  
in XDS.INP. To make XDS actually ''use'' that line, specify  
  SPACE_GROUP_NUMBER=1
  SPACE_GROUP_NUMBER=1
and leave the space group determination for later.
and leave the space group determination for later.
Line 162: Line 162:
Alternatively, try several well-separated SPOT_RANGEs instead of 1. For example, instead of
Alternatively, try several well-separated SPOT_RANGEs instead of 1. For example, instead of
  SPOT_RANGE=1 900
  SPOT_RANGE=1 900
try
try e.g.
  SPOT_RANGE=1 100
  SPOT_RANGE=1 100
  SPOT_RANGE=801 900
  SPOT_RANGE=801 900
In most cases, this makes IDXREF pick up the correct cell.
In the cases where I've tried this, this splitting of SPOT_RANGE into several wedges always resulted in IDXREF picking up the correct cell.  


I have seen this working well in many cases of too short cell parameters.
The reason for the indexing failure in these cases seems to be the fact that the crystal changed its orientation within the SPOT_RANGE by more than ~ 0.1°.


=== IDXREF prints !!! WARNING !!! message ===
=== IDXREF prints !!! WARNING !!! message ===
2,652

edits

Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.

Navigation menu