Line 3: |
Line 3: |
| == Definitions == | | == Definitions == |
| === Data quality indicators === | | === Data quality indicators === |
− | * R_sym and R_merge: the formula is (someone with LaTex knowledge please don't hesitate to fill in the formula!) | + | * R<sub>sym</sub> and R<sub>merge</sub> : the formula is (someone with LaTex knowledge please don't hesitate to fill in the formula!) |
− | * Redundancy-independant version of the above: R_meas | + | * Redundancy-independant version of the above: R<sub>meas</sub> |
− | * measuring quality of averaged intensities/amplitudes: R_p.i.m./R_mrgd-F | + | * measuring quality of averaged intensities/amplitudes: R<sub>p.i.m.</sub> and R<sub>mrgd-F</sub> |
| | | |
| === Model quality indicators === | | === Model quality indicators === |
− | * R and R_free: the formula is (LaTex please ) | + | * R and R<sub>free</sub> : the formula is (LaTex please ) |
| | | |
| == what do R-factors try to measure, and how to interpret their values? == | | == what do R-factors try to measure, and how to interpret their values? == |
Line 17: |
Line 17: |
| | | |
| == what kind of problems exist with these indicators? == | | == what kind of problems exist with these indicators? == |
− | - (R_sym/R_merge) should not be used, R_meas should be used instead (explain why ?) | + | - (R<sub>sym</sub> / R<sub>merge</sub> ) should not be used, R<sub>meas</sub> should be used instead (explain why ?) |
| | | |
− | - R/R_free and NCS: reflections in work and test set are not independant | + | - R/R<sub>free</sub> and NCS: reflections in work and test set are not independant |