Experimental phasing: Difference between revisions

3,144 bytes added ,  12 February 2009
a first try
No edit summary
(a first try)
Line 1: Line 1:
... much more to come! ...
== Heavy atom refinement and phasing programs ==
 
* [http://www.globalphasing.com/sharp/ SHARP]
 
SHARP was the first "product" of [http://www.globalphasing.com/ Global Phasing], in the mid '90s. It was a spectacular improvement over existing methods and has been described in [http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleURL&_udi=B7CV2-4B432JN-DY&_user=3208271&_coverDate=12%2F31%2F1997&_alid=865881649&_rdoc=5&_fmt=high&_orig=search&_cdi=18066&_sort=d&_docanchor=&view=c&_ct=5&_acct=C000047720&_version=1&_urlVersion=0&_userid=3208271&md5=1a457e261908cb35b80cd39fc7c7cd6d Maximum-likelihood heavy-atom parameter refinement for multiple isomorphous replacement and multiwavelength anomalous diffraction methods].
SHARP has been regularly improved since then, and the legendary 'week-long runs' now complete in a few minutes. Much has been argued about how SHARP implements Maximum Likelihood, and Phaser and BP3 claim to do better in SAD cases. SHARP does do really well for SAD phasing, but the main advantage still is the ability to describe very complicated experiments, involving multiple wavelengths, various crystals of the same derivative and various derivatives (all with or without anomalous data) in a very appropriate manner. All these can also be done through the autoSHARP pipeline as well.
 
* [[http://solve.lanl.gov/Solve/solve.html|SOLVE SOLVE]]
 
SOLVE was the first truly automated experimental phasing pipeline in the second half of the '90s. Its worth mentioning also in this section, since it uses a number of ingenious solutions to the phasing problem, e.g. correlated phasing, that produce phases of excellent quality and can easily be used just for phasing outside its own pipeline.
 
* [[http://shelx.uni-ac.gwdg.de/SHELX SHELXE]]


== Heavy atom refinement and phasing programs ==
SHELXE is again mostly used in the context of the SHELX suite and the HKL2MAP pipeline but is an excellent stand alone solution as well. Its peculiarity is the combination of phasing and density modification tricks in a very quick iterative fashion, and it can produce excellent results.
* [http://www.globalphasing.com/sharp/ SHARP] - G. Bricogne's maximum likelihood phasing program; not part of CCP4
 
* [[ccp4dev:Experimental_phasing_with_Phaser|PHASER]] - R. Read's maximum likelihood phasing program
* [[ccp4dev:Experimental_phasing_with_Phaser|PHASER]]  
* [[ccp4dev:Automated_experimental_phasing_with_Crank|BP3]] - R. Pannu's maximum likelihood phasing program
 
* MLPHARE - an old program which does not give as good results as the other programs; not even mentioned in article [[ccp4dev:Experimental_phasing_with_CCP4|Experimental phasing with CCP4]].
The newest kid in the block, many do not even realize its existence, since the experimental phasing module of PHASER has been overshadowed by the overwhelming success of the synonymous molecular replacement module. It will only work for SAD cases, but it crucially implements an option to combine molecular replacement with SAD phases. A very attractive idea if you ever have a bad search model and bad phases.
 
* [[ccp4dev:Automated_experimental_phasing_with_Crank|BP3]]
 
BP3 also implements SAD phasing in a statistical framework most similar to PHASER, which might be hardly surprising if one considers that the main authors of each program [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14684888?ordinalpos=7&itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_DefaultReportPanel.Pubmed_RVDocSum worked together to develop the theory]. BP3 has been showcased to produce better phases than e.g. SHARP in specific SAD cases. BP3 is the main phase refinement engine behind the CRANK suite.
 
* MLPHARE  
 
An old program which does not give as good results as the other programs; not even mentioned in article  
[[ccp4dev:Experimental_phasing_with_CCP4|Experimental phasing with CCP4]].
Will not hurt if used with really good data, and will not help much either. A direct decedent of PHARE and huge improvement of it, was supposedly implementing Maximum Likelihood on macromolecular phasing (ML). It has been widely recognized that this was only a useful approximation. Proper implementation of ML are being used in the programs above.
 
== Automated Pipelines ==
 
* autoSHARP
 
* Solve
 
* Phenix.Autobuild
 
* AutoRickshaw
 
* HKL2MAP
84

edits