Quality Control: Difference between revisions

From XDSwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
mNo edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
This is an attempt of putting together a number of datasets with different characteristics (high and low resolution, good and bad crystals, untwinned and twinned), their evaluation with different versions of XDS, and the determination of the quality of the resulting data using refinement and phasing.
This is an attempt of putting together a number of datasets with different characteristics (high and low resolution, good and bad crystals, untwinned and twinned), their evaluation with different versions of XDS, and the determination of the quality of the resulting data using refinement and phasing.
The goal of this project is to find generally optimal parameters for XDS data reduction, to monitor the progress of the program, and to discover bugs or regressions.
The goal of this project is to find generally optimal parameters for XDS data reduction, to monitor the progress of the program, and to discover bugs or regressions.
I'm currently working with Qingping Xu on identifying suitable datasets in the (publicly accessible!) JCSG dataset archive.





Revision as of 23:49, 23 January 2008

This is an attempt of putting together a number of datasets with different characteristics (high and low resolution, good and bad crystals, untwinned and twinned), their evaluation with different versions of XDS, and the determination of the quality of the resulting data using refinement and phasing. The goal of this project is to find generally optimal parameters for XDS data reduction, to monitor the progress of the program, and to discover bugs or regressions. I'm currently working with Qingping Xu on identifying suitable datasets in the (publicly accessible!) JCSG dataset archive.


PulG (good 2-wavelength MAD data @ 2.8 A)

Raw data: ftp://turn5.biologie.uni-konstanz.de/pub/datasets/

Reference: Köhler, R., Schäfer, K., Müller, S., Vignon, G., Diederichs, K., Philippsen, A., Ringler, P., Pugsley, A.P., Engel, A., Welte, W. (2004) Structure and assembly of the pseudopilin PulG. Molecular Microbiology 54, 647-664. [1]

XDS.INP for remote high data

JOB=XYCORR INIT COLSPOT IDXREF DEFPIX INTEGRATE CORRECT

! for this experiment:
ORGX=1031 ORGY=1001
DETECTOR_DISTANCE=220
OSCILLATION_RANGE=1
X-RAY_WAVELENGTH=0.97857
NAME_TEMPLATE_OF_DATA_FRAMES=images/pulg_semet_D22_2_???.img DIRECT  TIFF
DATA_RANGE=5 124
SPOT_RANGE=5 124
BACKGROUND_RANGE=5 14

SPACE_GROUP_NUMBER=179
UNIT_CELL_CONSTANTS= 85.5   85.5  145.2  90 90 120

FRIEDEL'S_LAW=FALSE
STRICT_ABSORPTION_CORRECTION=TRUE

! parameters with changes wrt default values:
VALUE_RANGE_FOR_TRUSTED_DETECTOR_PIXELS=8000. 30000.
TRUSTED_REGION=0. 0.99
MINIMUM_ZETA=0.05
INCLUDE_RESOLUTION_RANGE=50 0
STRONG_PIXEL=6
REFINE(INTEGRATE)=CELL BEAM ORIENTATION

! parameters specifically for this detector and beamline:
NX=2048 NY=2048 QX=0.079092  QY=0.079092   !MARCCD 165mm version
DETECTOR=CCDCHESS        MINIMUM_VALID_PIXEL_VALUE=0     OVERLOAD=65000
DIRECTION_OF_DETECTOR_X-AXIS=1 0 0
DIRECTION_OF_DETECTOR_Y-AXIS=0 1 0
INCIDENT_BEAM_DIRECTION=0 0 1
ROTATION_AXIS=1 0 0
FRACTION_OF_POLARIZATION=0.99
POLARIZATION_PLANE_NORMAL=0 1 0

XDS.INP for inflection point data

same as above, except

X-RAY_WAVELENGTH=0.97972
NAME_TEMPLATE_OF_DATA_FRAMES=images/pulg_semet_D22_3_???.img DIRECT  TIFF
DATA_RANGE=1 120
SPOT_RANGE=1 120
BACKGROUND_RANGE=1 10